Chapter V-3. Shore Protection ProjectsFigure V-3-1. Oosterschelde storm surge barriAlternatives for shore protection.Table V-3-2. Alternatives for Coastal Hazard MitigationTable V-3-2. Alternatives for Coastal Hazard Mitigation (cont)Figure V-3-2. Alternatives for shore protectionDesign constraints.Design ConstraintsFigure V-3-3. Shift from hard (armored walls, groins, etc.) to soft (beach nourishment) alternatives by the Corps of Engineers (from Hillyer 1996)Benefits.Beach nourishment can also enhance the natural environment.Benefit/cost ratios.Impact on natural sediment transport system.Institutional (policies and guidelines).Political (social well-being).Cultural resources must also be consideredLegal (laws).Aesthetics.Coastal Armoring StructuresFigure V-3-4. Different types of seawalls and dikes (from Pilarczyk 1990)Figure V-3-5. Galveston, Texas, seawallFigure V-3-5. Galveston, Texas, seawall (cont)Figure V-3-6. Virginia Beach seawall/boardwaFigure V-3-7. Typical bulkhead typesFunctional design.Figure V-3-8. Summary of revetment alternativesFigure V-3-8. Summary of revetment alternatives (cont)Interaction with adjacent beachesFigure V-3-9. Time scales for shoreline movementsConcerns Probably TrueTable V-3-3. Assessment of Commonly Expressed Concerns Related to Coastal Armoring (Dean 1987)Frontal impacts.Impacts on laterally adjacent beach.Active volume in the cross-shore profile.Beach Stabilization StructuresFigure V-3-10. Naturally stable shorelines with beach width dependent on stormwave energy (from Silvester and Hsu 1993)Headland breakwaters.Figure V-3-11. Natural and artificial stable shorelines with minimum dry beach width, YminFigure V-3-12. Definition sketch of artificial headland system and beach planform (from EM 1110-2-1617)Figure V-3-13. Definition sketch of parabolic model for planform shapeFigure V-3-14. Definition sketch, headland breakwatersVan Dyke ProjectNearshore breakwaters.Figure V-3-16. Headland breakwater project on the Chesapeake Bay (from Hardaway and Gunn 1999)Physical processes. - PartV-Chap30051Figure V-3-18. Santa Monica, California, breakwater and salient (circa 1967). Littoral drift from bottom to top (from Chasten et al. 1993)Shore Protection ProjectsFigure V-3-20. Definition schematic for nearshore breakwatersTable V-3-4. Summary of U.S. Breakwater Projects (from Chasten et al. 1993)Salients or tombolos.Figure V-3-21. Definitions of key variables for nearshore breakwaterTable V-3-5. Empirical Relationships for Nearshore Breakwater DesignSalients or tombolos. (cont)Table V-3-6. Conditions for Shoreline Response Behind Nearshore Breakwaters (from Chasten et al. 1993)Figure V-3-22. Dimensionless plot of nearshore breakwater projects For Y/ds versus Ls/Lg (from Pope and Dean 1986)Other design factors.Nontraditional designs.EXAMPLE PROBLEM V-3-1EXAMPLE PROBLEM V-3-1 (cont)Figure V-3-23. General shoreline adjustment for direction of net longshore transportGroins.Figure V-3-24. Rubble-mound groin, Westhampton Beach, New YorkFigure V-3-25. Timber sheet-pile groin, NASA Space Flight Center, Wallops Island, VirginiaFigure V-3-26. Timber-steel sheet-pile groin, New JerseyFigure V-3-27. Prestressed-concrete sheet-pile groin, Dohney Beach State Park, CaliforniaFigure V-3-28. Cellular-steel sheet-pile groin, Presque Isle, PennsylvaniaTable V-3-7. Main Parameters Governing Beach Response and Bypassing at Groins (from Kraus, Hanson, and Blomgren 1994)Table V-3-8. Functional Properties Attributed to Groins and their Critical Evaluation (from Kraus, Hanson, and Blomgren 1994)Physical processes. - PartV-Chap30075Functional designFigure V-3-29. Definition sketch of key variables in the functioning of groinsTable V-3-9. Process-Based Factors Controlling GroinsFigure V-3-30. Westhampton Beach, New York, groin field and renourished beach, 1998 (courtesy USAED, New York)Figure V-3-31. Typical groin profile with sloping sectionFigure V-3-32. Transition from groin field to natural beachBasic rules for functional design of groins.Cross-section modelReefs, sills and wetlands.Wave attenuation.Nonstructural AlternativesBreakwater and sill project afterRetreatBaytown, Texas.Special cases.Table V-3-11. Cape Hatteras, North Carolina, Shore Protection HistoryCombinations and New TechnologiesCombinations.Cross sectionNew technologies.Geotextile filled bags.Innovative technology demonstration program.Do-NothingReferences - PartV-Chap30099References (cont) - PartV-Chap30100References (cont) - PartV-Chap30101References (cont) - PartV-Chap30102References (cont) - PartV-Chap30103References (cont) - PartV-Chap30104References (cont) - PartV-Chap30105References (cont) - PartV-Chap30106References (cont) - PartV-Chap30107References (cont) - PartV-Chap30108References (cont) - PartV-Chap30109References (cont) - PartV-Chap30110References (cont) - PartV-Chap30111References (cont) - PartV-Chap30112References (cont) - PartV-Chap30113References (cont) - PartV-Chap30114Definition of Symbols - PartV-Chap30115Acknowledgments - PartV-Chap30116PartV-Chap3